Programs: Science and Policy
http://shr.aaas.org//coalition/AreasofActivity/Service_to_the_Human_Rights_Community.html
AAAS Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights and Law Program
AAAS Science and Human Rights Coalition
Welfare of Scientists | Science Ethics and Human Rights | Service to the STEM Community | Education and Information Resources
Area of Activity IV: Service to the Human Rights Community
Co-Chairs: Brian Gran (American Sociological Association)
Susan Hinkins (American Statistical Association)
Patricia Van Arnum (Affiliated Scientist)
The Service to the Human Rights Community working group is devoted to bridging the scientific and human rights communities with the aim of encouraging and facilitating the greater engagement of scientists in efforts to advance human rights.
Rationale
All scientists – behavioral, life, physical, and social – have skills and knowledge of potential benefit to the human rights community. By providing timely, accurate, and verifiable data for human rights claims, scientists can help human rights organizations carry out more effective, evidence-based advocacy. Scientists can also assist with testing and evaluation of human rights projects and programs to ensure they benefit the intended populations. Analysis that is widely viewed as objective and based in evidence will buttress the credibility of human rights organizations and their claims. That all scientists have valuable tools and expertise to contribute is noted from the very important contributions that physical scientists (e.g., geospatial technologies) and life scientists (e.g., forensic and genetic sciences) have made to, for example, documenting human rights violations and identifying victims. This suggests that it would be valuable to build ongoing communication between the scientific and human rights communities to determine where and how quantitative and qualitative approaches and scientific tools and technologies can be useful to human rights work, and then assist in making these accessible to human rights practitioners.
Current Projects
The working group’s programmatic activities are carried out along two parallel tracks: pursuit of the Coalition’s overarching initiative and specialized area of activity projects. These activities are envisioned to be mutually supportive and reinforcing, with progress on one enhancing the likelihood of progress in another. The group is currently pursuing the following projects.
Indicators: Measuring Compliance with Article 15
Goal: |
To develop a guide to assist human rights organizations monitor and track how well a government is meeting its obligations under Article 15. |
Activities: |
Conduct research concerning current evaluation techniques relevant to economic, social, and cultural rights; coordinate with the Service to the Scientific Community working group to select several indicators, of different types, to focus on “how” to evaluate progress towards compliance with Article 15; investigate available data sources and develop potential measures; demonstrate application of metrics with reference to select indicators. |
Outputs: |
List of indicators by which to measure implementation of Article 15; analysis of data sources and data needs to effectively apply indicators; identification of barriers to collecting data relevant to applying indicators; analysis of US progress towards realizing Article 15 with reference to select indicators. |
Guidelines for Scientists Working with Human Rights Organizations
Goal: |
To produce a set of guidelines to facilitate and promote cooperation between scientists and human rights organizations. |
Activities: |
Work in conjunction with members of the human rights community and “On-Call” Scientists to develop a guide to facilitate the collaboration between scientists and human rights organizations, and promote greater involvement of scientists with human rights work. Drawing on prior experience of collaborating scientists and human rights organizations, the document will address the unique role science and scientists can play in human rights work and set out how to build a strong working relationship and manage expectations of both parties. |
Outputs: |
The final 15-20 page Guidelines will be made available via the Coalition website and directly publicized through human rights clinics (see below) and AAAS’s “On-Call” Scientists program. |
Clinics to Connect Scientists and Human Rights Organizations
Goal: |
To engage scientists and human rights organizations in a constructive dialogue aimed at identifying specific opportunities for scientists to contribute to the organizations’ work and facilitating partnerships between scientists and the organizations.
|
Activities: |
Engage human rights organizations in an informal process to identify those organizations that may benefit from the contribution of a scientist. Invite each organization to take part in a 1-2 hour discussion (Clinic) with an interdisciplinary team of 2 or 3 scientists to develop specific recommendations for how scientific assistance may benefit the human rights organization’s work. In collaboration with AAAS’s “On-call” Scientists program, facilitate the development of partnerships between the human rights organizations and scientists. Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the Clinics as a mechanism for facilitating the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to human rights work. |
Outputs: |
The first Clinic was held in September, 2010, and subsequent clinics occur every 2-3 months. To view successful pairings and pending requests from Clinics and other "On-Call" Scientist projects, visit the “On-Call” Scientists webpage. Opportunities for publishing the impact of the Clinics, including within widely circulated human rights publications, will be pursued. |
Proposed Projects
Short Questionnaire to Assess a Human Rights Organization’s Needs
Goal: |
Resources permitting, to research and develop a short questionnaire to assist human rights organizations in assessing their scientific needs.
|
Activities: |
Conduct a feasibility assessment, through work with Clinic participants. If it is agreed that a survey is feasible and beneficial, develop a survey to assist human rights groups in determining whether and how a scientific expert may be able to contribute to their work. The survey will be based on preliminary research of Clinic participants, as well as Clinic discussions and feedback from both scientists and human rights organizations. Modifications and additions to the survey are expected as the group receives more feedback from Clinic participants. |
Outputs: |
The survey will be made available online via the Coalition webpage, and may be sent to potential clinic participants to solicit preliminary information. The survey will also be provided to AAAS for distribution to a global network of human rights organization, to encourage greater participation by human rights organizations in the “On-call” Scientists program. |
Guide for Publishing in Human Rights Journals
Goal: |
Resources permitting, to research and develop a guide for scientists publishing in human rights journals. The guide would be accompanied by an informational handout or article encouraging such publications.
|
Activities: |
Conduct a feasibility assessment, through dialogue with scientists who have already published in human rights journals and/or have worked on human rights projects. Elicit feedback on the process of publishing in human rights journals or, if such publications have not been attempted, the reasons for which scientists are reluctant to publish in human rights journals. If it is agreed that a guide is feasible and would encourage and facilitate scientific publications in human rights journals, a guide will be developed based on input from scientists, science editors, human rights publishers and human rights practitioners. |
Outputs: |
A short online guide for scientists interested in publishing in human rights journals will be available online and will be circulated via Coalition members and “On-Call” Scientists. |
Progress
The working group identified the following priorities for 2009:
- Begin documenting how scientific associations provide services to the human rights community*
- Open a dialogue with human rights organizations concerning their science and technology needs
- Make a short presentation at the AAAS meeting in February 2010
- Begin defining “Guidelines” for scientists working with human rights, in order to better prepare scientists for working with non-science organizations and in particular human rights organizations.
Since July 2009, the group has laid the framework for a set of Guidelines aimed at facilitating collaborations between scientists and human rights organizations. In late June, a subset of the working group met with “on-call” scientists and members of the human rights community to discuss the proposed content of the Guidelines. In addition to the Guidelines, working group members have reached out to personal contacts within human rights groups for the purpose of developing a dialogue with the human rights community concerning their needs, and the potential role and function of scientists. Drawing from these discussions, and with the assistance of AAAS Science and Human Rights Program staff and interns, the group will proceed to establish participatory “clinics” in which human rights organizations and scientists will meet to identify human rights projects that could benefit from scientific expertise. This group operates under the leadership of three co-chairs who are each responsible for one area of the working groups’ activities.
*Since July 2009 the Education and Information Resources Working Group has produced a set of case studies illustrating how scientific associations provide services to the human rights community. As a result, this item has been removed from the priorities of the Service to the Human Rights Community Working Group.
Further information
For further information about the working group’s objectives and activities, click here.
If you wish to find out more about this working group and how your association can participate, please contact the working group co-chairs, Brian Gran (American Sociological Association) or Susan Hinkins (American Statistical Association).
(page updated 02/01/2012)

